Logo image
Back
US Population Size and Outcomes of Adults on Liver Transplant Waiting Lists
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

US Population Size and Outcomes of Adults on Liver Transplant Waiting Lists

Tomohiro Tanaka, George Wehby, Mark Vander Weg, Keith Mueller and David Axelrod
JAMA network open, Vol.8(3), e251759
03/03/2025
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1759
PMCID: PMC11937946
PMID: 40131274
url
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1759View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Disparities in organ supply and demand led to geographic inequities in the score-based liver transplant (LT) allocation system, prompting a change to allocation based on acuity circles (AC) defined by fixed distances. However, fixed distances do not ensure equivalent population size, potentially creating new sources of disparity. To estimate the association between population size around LT centers and waiting list outcomes for critically ill patients with chronic end-stage liver disease and high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores or acute liver failure (ALF). This US nationwide retrospective cohort study included adult (aged ≥18 years) candidates for deceased donor LT wait-listed between June 18, 2013, and May 31, 2023. Follow-up was completed June 30, 2023. Participants were divided into pre-AC and post-AC groups. Population size within defined radii around each LT center (150 nautical miles [nm] for participants with high MELD scores and 500 nm for those with ALF) based on AC allocation policy. LT candidate waiting list mortality and dropout rate were analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effect models with random intercepts for center and listing date before and after AC implementation. Fine-Gray competing risk regression, accounting for clustering, was used as a secondary model. The study analyzed 6142 LT candidates (1581 with ALF and 4561 with high MELD scores) during the pre-AC era and 4344 candidates (749 with ALF and 3595 with high- MELD scores) in the post-AC era, for a total of 10 486 participants (6331 male [60.5%]; mean [SD] age, 48.5 [7.1] years). In the high-MELD cohort, being listed at a center in the lowest tertile of population size was associated with increased waiting list mortality in the AC era (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.68; 95% CI, 1.14-2.46). Doubling of the population size was associated with a 34% reduction in the odds of mortality or dropout (AOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.90). These results were consistent with those of the extended Fine-Gray models and were also corroborated by multiple sensitivity analyses. However, there were no significant population density-associated disparities in the ALF cohort. In this retrospective nationwide cohort study, being wait-listed in less populated regions was associated with greater mortality among critically ill LT candidates with high MELD scores, underscoring the limitations of allocation systems based purely on fixed distances.
 United States Adult End Stage Liver Disease - mortality End Stage Liver Disease - surgery Female Humans Liver Failure, Acute - mortality Liver Failure, Acute - surgery Liver Transplantation - statistics & numerical data Male Middle Aged Population Density Retrospective Studies Tissue and Organ Procurement - methods Tissue and Organ Procurement - statistics & numerical data Waiting Lists

Details

Metrics

9 Record Views
3 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image