Journal article
Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review
Cell, Vol.179(7), pp.1441-1445
12/12/2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.029
PMID: 31835023
Abstract
Despite being a staple of our science, the process of pre-publication peer review has few agreed-upon standards defining its goals or ideal execution. As a community of reviewers and authors, we assembled an evaluation format and associated specific standards for the process as we think it should be practiced. We propose that we apply, debate, and ultimately extend these to improve the transparency of our criticism and the speed with which quality data and ideas become public.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Universal Principled Review: A Community-Driven Method to Improve Peer Review
- Creators
- Matthew Krummel - University of California, San FranciscoCatherine Blish - Stanford UniversityMichael Kuhns - University of ArizonaKen Cadwell - York UniversityAndrew Oberst - University of WashingtonAnanda Goldrath - University of California San DiegoK Mark Ansel - University of California, San FranciscoHongbo Chi - Children's Research HospitalRyan O'Connell - University of UtahE John Wherry - University of PennsylvaniaMarion Pepper - University of Washington
- Contributors
- Future Immunology Consortium (Contributor)John T Harty (Contributor) - University of Iowa, Pathology
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Cell, Vol.179(7), pp.1441-1445
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2019.11.029
- PMID
- 31835023
- NLM abbreviation
- Cell
- ISSN
- 0092-8674
- eISSN
- 1097-4172
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 12/12/2019
- Academic Unit
- Pathology
- Record Identifier
- 9984186541702771
Metrics
9 Record Views