Journal article
Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians
Journal of digital imaging, Vol.33(2), pp.334-340
04/01/2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00279-z
PMCID: PMC7165203
PMID: 31515753
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess if clinical indications, patient location, and imaging sites predict the viewing pattern of referring physicians for CT and MR of the head, chest, and abdomen. Our study included 166,953 CT/MR images of head/chest/abdomen in 2016-2017 in the outpatient (OP, n = 83,981 CT/MR), inpatient (IP, n = 51,052), and emergency (ED, n = 31,920) settings. There were 125,329 CT/MR performed in the hospital setting and 41,624 in one of the nine off-campus locations. We extracted information regarding body region (head/chest/abdomen), patient location, and imaging site from the electronic medical records (EPIC). We recorded clinical indications and the number of times referring physicians viewed CT/MR (defined as the number of separate views of imaging in the EPIC). Data were analyzed with the Microsoft SQL and SPSS statistical software. About 33% of IP CT and MR studies are viewed > 6 times compared to 7% for OP and 19% of ED studies (p < 0.001). Conversely, most OP studies (55%) were viewed 1-2 times only, compared to 21% for IP and 38% for ED studies (p < 0.001). In-hospital exams are viewed (>= 6 views; 39% studies) more frequently than off-campus imaging (>= 6 views; 17% studies) (p < 0.001). For head CT/MR, certain clinical indications (i.e., stroke) had higher viewing rates compared to other clinical indications such as malignancy, headache, and dizziness. Conversely, for chest CT, dyspnea-hypoxia had much higher viewing rates (> 6 times) in IP (55%) and ED (46%) than in OP settings (22%). Patient location and imaging site regardless of clinical indications have a profound effect on viewing patterns of referring physicians. Understanding viewing patterns of the referring physicians can help guide interpretation priorities and finding communication for imaging exams based on patient location, imaging site, and clinical indications. The information can help in the efficient delivery of patient care.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Viewing Imaging Studies: How Patient Location and Imaging Site Affect Referring Physicians
- Creators
- Fatemeh Homayounieh - Massachusetts General HospitalRamandeep Singh - Massachusetts General HospitalTianqi Chen - Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteEllen J. Sugarman - Mass General BrighamThomas J. Schultz - Mass General BrighamSubba R. Digumarthy - Massachusetts General HospitalKeith J. Dreyer - Massachusetts General HospitalMannudeep K. Kalra - Massachusetts General Hospital
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of digital imaging, Vol.33(2), pp.334-340
- Publisher
- Springer Nature
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10278-019-00279-z
- PMID
- 31515753
- PMCID
- PMC7165203
- ISSN
- 0897-1889
- eISSN
- 1618-727X
- Number of pages
- 7
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 04/01/2020
- Academic Unit
- Radiology
- Record Identifier
- 9984697724902771
Metrics
4 Record Views