Logo image
Back
Exploring neural mechanisms underlying error-related impairments in active working memory suggests an adaptive shielding of contents during cognitive control
Preprint   Open access

Exploring neural mechanisms underlying error-related impairments in active working memory suggests an adaptive shielding of contents during cognitive control

Yoojeong Choo, Kirsten C S Adam and Jan R Wessel
bioRxiv
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
07/23/2025
DOI: 10.1101/2025.07.19.665355
PMCID: PMC12330712
PMID: 40777247
url
https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.07.19.665355View
Preprint (Author's original)This preprint has not been evaluated by subject experts through peer review. Preprints may undergo extensive changes and/or become peer-reviewed journal articles. Open Access

Abstract

Goal-directed behavior relies on cognitive flexibility - the ability to rapidly adapt ongoing thoughts and behaviors while preserving task-relevant information. The performance monitoring system optimizes such behavior by detecting and evaluating errors, while the working memory (WM) system maintains relevant information and protects it from interference. We investigated how these two systems interact. In prior work (Wessel et al., 2022), we found that motor errors impaired active WM maintenance (Error-Related Impairment of Active working Memory; ERIAM). Here, we aimed to identify the source of ERIAM by tracking a neurophysiological marker of visual WM maintenance - the contralateral delay activity (CDA) - throughout the error-making process. Forty-two human participants maintained visual information in WM while performing a motoric task during the delay period. Consistent with prior results, a significant ERIAM effect occurred: motor errors impaired WM performance. Critically, CDA amplitudes did not differ between motor correct and error trials before the flanker task, ruling out a general performance deficit. The CDA was also unaffected immediately after flankers, ruling out a perceptual interference explanation. Significant CDA differences only emerged after motor errors, supporting a genuinely error-related origin of the ERIAM effect. Contrary to prediction, however, CDA was more disrupted after correct responses than errors, and greater disruptions predicted a smaller ERIAM effect. These findings suggest that participants might store WM in multiple states to reduce interference from errors and that the CDA dynamics reflect these adaptive shielding strategies. These findings provide new insights into the source of error-related interference in active WM.

Details

Metrics

4 Record Views
Logo image