People’s desires for an outcome might influence their optimism that the outcome will occur. This is called the desirability bias, or the wishful-thinking effect. The desirability bias occurs when people’s expectations or hopes for an outcome override objectivity when making a prediction about an event. While many studies have shown a desirability bias when asking for dichotomous predictions, few studies have measured how changing the metric influences predictions. In the current study, three types of questions were asked to measure participants’ predictions of the outcome of an endurance race, where participants were assigned one of two competitors. Participants were told if their assigned athlete won the race they would receive a candy bar. In a between-subjects design, participants answered either a dichotomous prediction, a dichotomous likelihood judgment, or a continuous likelihood judgment. We found evidence that the strength of the desirability bias varied between types of questions asked, specifically that there was no desirability bias in continuous likelihood judgments and more desirability bias in the dichotomous prediction condition. This research suggests that the wording of a question has a large impact on conclusions about the desirability bias, which has implications for both scientific research and everyday decision-making.
Thesis
Desirability Bias: Do Desires Influence Expectations? It Depends on How You Ask.
University of Iowa
Bachelor of Arts (BA), University of Iowa
Spring 2018
Abstract
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Desirability Bias: Do Desires Influence Expectations? It Depends on How You Ask.
- Creators
- Mark Biangmano - University of Iowa
- Contributors
- Toby Mordkoff (Advisor)Paul D Windschitl (Mentor) - University of Iowa, Psychological and Brain Sciences
- Resource Type
- Thesis
- Project Type
- Honors Thesis
- Degree Awarded
- Bachelor of Arts (BA), University of Iowa
- Degree in
- Psychology
- Date degree season
- Spring 2018
- Publisher
- University of Iowa
- Number of pages
- 20 pages
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2018 Mark Biangmano
- Language
- English
- Academic Unit
- Honors Program; CLAS Honors Theses
- Record Identifier
- 9984111223002771
Metrics
111 File views/ downloads
265 Record Views