Working paper
How Reasonable Are Assumptions Used in Theoretical Models? : Computational Evidence on the Likelihood of Trade Pattern Changes. Lisandro Abrego, Raymond Riezman, John Whalley
NBER working paper series, Vol.8169
National Bureau of Economic Research
03/2001
DOI: 10.3386/w8169
Abstract
This paper seeks to contribute to discussion of the reasonableness of sometimes seemingly innocent assumptions used in theoretical trade models that the direction of trade is both predetermined for each good for each country and fixed. Here, we provide computational evidence as to the reasonableness of this assumption. We consider a simple three-country, three-good, pure-exchange model with CES preferences. We compute free trade competitive equilibria, three-country non-cooperative Nash equilibria, and customs union equilibria for randomized parameterizations, and find that trade patterns change in around 35% of the cases between free trade and customs union equilibria. In three-country Nash and customs unions comparisons trade patterns change roughly 40% of the time. We evaluate alternative cases, including with different numbers of randomizations in the parameter space. Results remain robust, reinforcing our conclusion that the assumption of unchanged trade pattern changes, common in theoretical analysis, does not have firm numerical support in the cases we consider.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- How Reasonable Are Assumptions Used in Theoretical Models? : Computational Evidence on the Likelihood of Trade Pattern Changes. Lisandro Abrego, Raymond Riezman, John Whalley
- Creators
- John WhalleyLisandro AbregoRaymond Riezman
- Resource Type
- Working paper
- Publication Details
- NBER working paper series, Vol.8169
- DOI
- 10.3386/w8169
- ISSN
- 0898-2937
- Publisher
- National Bureau of Economic Research; Cambridge, Massachusetts
- Language
- English
- Date posted
- 03/2001
- Academic Unit
- Economics
- Record Identifier
- 9984963077502771
Metrics
61 Record Views