Logo image
Back
Modeling F-18-FDG Kinetics during Acute Lung Injury: Experimental Data and Estimation Errors
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Modeling F-18-FDG Kinetics during Acute Lung Injury: Experimental Data and Estimation Errors

A. Susanne Dittrich, Tilo Winkler, Tyler Wellman, Nicolas de Prost, Guido Musch, R. Scott Harris and Marcos F. Vidal Melo
PloS one, Vol.7(10), 47588
10/31/2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047588
PMID: 23118881
url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047588View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background: There is increasing interest in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]flouro-D-glucose (F-18-FDG) to evaluate pulmonary inflammation during acute lung injury (ALI). We assessed the effect of extra-vascular lung water on estimates of F-18-FDG-kinetics parameters in experimental and simulated data using the Patlak and Sokoloff methods, and our recently proposed four-compartment model. Methodology/Principal Findings: Eleven sheep underwent unilateral lung lavage and 4 h mechanical ventilation. Five sheep received intravenous endotoxin (10 ng/kg/min). Dynamic F-18-FDG PET was performed at the end of the 4 h period. F-18-FDG net uptake rate (Ki), phosphorylation rate (k(3)), and volume of distribution (F-e) were estimated in three isogravitational regions for each method. Simulations of normal and ALI F-18-FDG-kinetics were conducted to study the dependence of estimated parameters on the transport rate constants to (k(5)) and from (k(6)) the extra-vascular extra-cellular compartment. The four-compartment model described 85.7% of the studied F-18-FDG-kinetics better than the Sokoloff model. Relative to the four-compartment model the Sokoloff model exhibited a consistent positive bias in Ki (3.32 [1.30-5.65] 10(-4)/min, p<0.001) and showed inaccurate estimates of the parameters composing Ki (k(3) and F-e), even when Ki was similar for those methods. In simulations, errors in estimates of Ki due to the extra-vascular extra-cellular compartment depended on both k(5) and k(5)/k(6), with errors for the Patlak and Sokoloff methods of 0.02 [-0.01-0.18] and 0.40 [0.18-0.60] 10(-3)/min for normal lungs and of -0.47 [-0.89-0.72] and 2.35 [0.85-3.68] 10(-3)/min in ALI. Conclusions/Significance: F-18-FDG accumulation in lung extra-vascular fluid, which is commonly increased during lung injury, can result in substantial estimation errors using the traditional Patlak and Sokoloff methods. These errors depend on the extra-vascular extra-cellular compartment volume and its transport rates with other compartments. The four-compartment model provides more accurate quantification of F-18-FDG-kinetics than those methods in the presence of increased extra-vascular fluid.
 Multidisciplinary Sciences Science & Technology Science & Technology - Other Topics

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image